gridlore: Doug looking off camera with a grin (Bosch)
[personal profile] gridlore
Ladies, gentlemen, a brief announcement.

There is one hell of a lot more to FANDOM than writing kinky sex stories about the characters!

I am sick to death of people who see this activity as the be-all and end-all of fandom. Some of these folks don't even know what fandom is or its history. The term is being debased by people who assume that they have to establish their own "fandom" that has walls stronger than Helm's Deep.

Diversify, people! So you love Harry Potter? Go read Le Guin! A Wizard of Earthsea is fantastic in every way, and will not prevent you from reading more Harry Potter. [livejournal.com profile] ataniell93, this doesn't refer to you. I know your interests are diverse. But some of these people!

Go to a general-interest science-fiction convention. Don't mention your particular obsession for an entire weekend. You'll be amazed at what happens.

Just had to get that off my chest.

Date: 18 Dec 2003 09:28 (UTC)
cleverthylacine: a cute little thylacine (darling diego)
From: [personal profile] cleverthylacine
Also, if you've read my stories you know they're not just about teh kinky sexxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

Date: 18 Dec 2003 10:13 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bunyip.livejournal.com
You might be interested in this? (http://rictusem.poetic-genius.org/gross/)

Date: 18 Dec 2003 14:23 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lysana.livejournal.com
I have some lovely friends who use the term "fandom" to mean "the TV show I watch religiously and read and write fanfic about." I wince every time they do. Thus the icon.

Date: 19 Dec 2003 23:46 (UTC)
kengr: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kengr
Technically fandom and TV are about the same age. The first TV broadcast was during the 1930-something(1939?) New York World'd Fair.

Date: 20 Dec 2003 00:01 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blackfyr.livejournal.com
Since science fiction fandom dates from the early 20's, your premise already fails the veracity test. Since SF-TV fandom didn't start until decades later, your statement has fallen even farther away from legitimacy.

Date: 20 Dec 2003 05:25 (UTC)
kengr: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kengr
I thought fand only dated back to the ealy 30s. Or, at best the late 20s. As that's when Gernsback started publishing an SF magazine (Amazing, as I recall).

And I did say "nearly".

Date: 18 Dec 2003 16:17 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] radicledgrl.livejournal.com
There is one hell of a lot more to FANDOM than writing kinky sex stories about the characters!

Thank you!!! It gets out of control sometimes.

Date: 18 Dec 2003 19:43 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aurictech.livejournal.com
Rather than "fandom," the more appropriate term for those whom you describe might be "fanboydom".... :P

While sex is an important part of life (I wouldn't even be here without it...), it's not the only important activity in which people engage. By extension, it shouldn't be the only important activity in which characters engage.

Then again, we're probably both preaching to the choir on this....

Date: 19 Dec 2003 14:22 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] todkaninchen.livejournal.com
NONKINKY sex can be so tedious though...

Date: 19 Dec 2003 23:48 (UTC)
kengr: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kengr
There's a reason "media fen" tend to annoy the hell out of "trufen". :-(

Star Trek started the downhill slide. Star Wars created the avalanche.

Date: 21 Dec 2003 18:08 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cmdr-zoom.livejournal.com
What did X-Files and Harry Potter do, then? Steepen the slope?

Date: 22 Dec 2003 00:46 (UTC)
kengr: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kengr
The avalanche hit the bottom long before either of those.

Profile

gridlore: Doug looking off camera with a grin (Default)
Douglas Berry

October 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
2223 2425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 12th, 2025 11:12 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios