Netflix delivers a good one.
Jan. 8th, 2006 10:18 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Batman Begins was one of those movies that I really meant to see in the theater.. but a combination of other obligations and a lack of funds kept me from doing so.
Netflix brought it to my door the other day, and I am very happy with the film. Christian Bale is nearly perfect as the young Dark Knight, and Gary Oldman simply becomes Lt. James Gordon.
But the best part was how they handled Batman's gear and Gotham City. One of the problems of the last couple of Batman films was that I stopped believing in both the city and the equipment. Batman is supposed to be based somewhere in reality.. someone could do what he does with enough money, talent, and determination. In the same vein, Gotham is supposed to be a real city. Dirty, crowded, with different neighborhoods showing different faces. The later Batman films turned Gotham into some weird art deco nightmare, with nothing at all real about it. Same with Batman. The gear was ridiculous by the time of Batman & Robin. Not so in Batman Begins. Gotham is a very real city, with the exception of the monorail system. Batman's gear is quite feasible. (Forbes magazine did a story on what it would cost to make yourself Batman. About $3.5 million, but you're on your own in finding an ancient order of ninja to train you.)
Possibly may favorite point was that while there were two members of Batman's rogues' gallery in the film, they were pretty much separate stories. Ra's Al Ghul was masterfully played by Liam Neeson (and if you object that he actually played Henri Duchard, you don't know your Bat history.) and Cillian Murphy was appropriately psychotic as Dr. Crane/The Scarecrow.
Good film. Well worth seeing again.
Next up: Better Off Dead, one of my all time favorites.
Netflix brought it to my door the other day, and I am very happy with the film. Christian Bale is nearly perfect as the young Dark Knight, and Gary Oldman simply becomes Lt. James Gordon.
But the best part was how they handled Batman's gear and Gotham City. One of the problems of the last couple of Batman films was that I stopped believing in both the city and the equipment. Batman is supposed to be based somewhere in reality.. someone could do what he does with enough money, talent, and determination. In the same vein, Gotham is supposed to be a real city. Dirty, crowded, with different neighborhoods showing different faces. The later Batman films turned Gotham into some weird art deco nightmare, with nothing at all real about it. Same with Batman. The gear was ridiculous by the time of Batman & Robin. Not so in Batman Begins. Gotham is a very real city, with the exception of the monorail system. Batman's gear is quite feasible. (Forbes magazine did a story on what it would cost to make yourself Batman. About $3.5 million, but you're on your own in finding an ancient order of ninja to train you.)
Possibly may favorite point was that while there were two members of Batman's rogues' gallery in the film, they were pretty much separate stories. Ra's Al Ghul was masterfully played by Liam Neeson (and if you object that he actually played Henri Duchard, you don't know your Bat history.) and Cillian Murphy was appropriately psychotic as Dr. Crane/The Scarecrow.
Good film. Well worth seeing again.
Next up: Better Off Dead, one of my all time favorites.
Of a similar genre, perhaps
Date: 8 Jan 2006 19:29 (UTC)As I remember, it was fairly good the first two seasons, and handled doing things in a plausible urban environment. IIRC, the city was never named, but I think was Vancouver,
In the third season, they started going weird, with alternate universes, alien invasions, etc., and blew away what had been a fairly good show, crime-oriented as was Batman.
Anyone else remember it or have thoughts?
Re: Of a similar genre, perhaps
Date: 8 Jan 2006 19:31 (UTC)Re: Of a similar genre, perhaps
Date: 8 Jan 2006 20:23 (UTC)Lots of cool stuff has been filmed here, including Fantastic Four where Vancouver stood in for NYC. Very cool to walk down a street and see incredibly realistic-looking subway entrances that actually lead to nothing. ;)
Re: Of a similar genre, perhaps
Date: 8 Jan 2006 20:29 (UTC)The "tracks" were so realistic the city had to put up signs stating that there was no line running here, and to go one street over for the real cable car.
Re: Of a similar genre, perhaps
Date: 8 Jan 2006 20:39 (UTC)I took pictures intending to post them, but I've never had much luck posting them because I don't upload them to a personal website. It's fun to watch locally filmed stuff to pick out the impossibilities of going down one street, turning a corner, and being physically 10 miles away. :D Of the recent films shot near my work, Blade Trinity, Fantastic Four and I Robot come to mind. Although they tend to film at night so I haven't seen anyone famous. Oh, and Smallville... the LuthorCorp building is right next door to me. :)
Re: Of a similar genre, perhaps
Date: 8 Jan 2006 20:40 (UTC)Vancouver is one of my favorite cities; I've been known to annoy people by saying that if San Francisco was set in prettier terrain, it would be more like Vancouver.
Actually, I love both cities, but live in the urban suburbs just outside Washington DC. I was in the city proper, not far from Georgetown University, when they filmed "The Exorcist". The wind machines were distinctly annoying.
Thanks for finding what it stood for...the I is the I in transmitter? When it was on, my ex was more and more dependent on a wheelchair, and, from a practical and engineering standpoint, enjoyed what they did with adaptive devices. I wish they had stayed "mainstream" and kept the show running longer.
Good comment -- I'll put you on my friends list, and you'd be welcome to reciprocate.
Howard
Re: Of a similar genre, perhaps
Date: 8 Jan 2006 20:47 (UTC)The other cool thing about imdb.com is this exactly. You can look up an actor you like, look at their acting history and see something from waaaaay back that you never realised they were in. :D
Re: Of a similar genre, perhaps
Date: 8 Jan 2006 21:33 (UTC)The site doesn't let you. :-/
Re: Of a similar genre, perhaps
Date: 8 Jan 2006 21:48 (UTC)Re: Of a similar genre, perhaps
Date: 8 Jan 2006 20:30 (UTC)