gridlore: Doug looking off camera with a grin (Me - Game Master)
[personal profile] gridlore
Get your minds out the gutter, I'm ranting about Terran Empire again.

In this book, the Empire covers roughly 1/5th of the galaxy. Let us ponder that for a moment. Our galaxy contains roughly 400 billion stars. 20% of that number is 80 billion. 80 billion stars in the empire. Way too fucking big.

Let's look at the local region, out to about 50ly from Earth. According to my sources, that gives us 998 stars, 211 of which are considered to be good candidates for life-bearing systems.

Map of all known stars within 50 light years

A thousand star systems should be plenty big enough for anyone!

Now let's play with some assumptions. Let's say that only 1% of those probably habitable systems has a world that humans can live on without much aid (garden worlds, much like Earth.) Another 5% or so fall into the "close, but no cigar" realm.. one or more factors renders the place less than ideal for humans, but still livable (extremes in temperature, high/low O2 levels, high surface UV exposures, whatever) That gives us 2 twins of Earth, and 11 near-misses. There are you core systems, the ones that will grow quickly and become the population centers.

Not that I'm being extremely conservative with these numbers.

Now, travel times. During the Roman Empire, no place the empire controlled was more than six months away from the capital. Sounds like a good goal. To get out to 50ly from Earth in 6 months will take an engine that moves you (somehow) 100 times faster than light. Call this the average cruising speed of military vessels. So how long to get from Earth to Luyten's Star?

The distance is 12.388ly. Dividing by 100 gives us 0.12388. Multiplying by 365 gives 45.21 days. A month and a half. Good. Starships in this setting are going to be akin to the luxury liners of a bygone age. Of course, the Captain could order full power (130c) and cut nearly two weeks off the journey.

Yes, my game setting is starting to gel nicely...

Date: 28 Sep 2005 01:30 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cmdr-zoom.livejournal.com
I would suggest making one of those 11 near-misses be a world that SHOULD be a garden, except that the local life doesn't play well with Earth life. Not in an insanely-hostile fashion, with toothy acid-blooded things everywhere ... just pointing out that sometimes, a world WITHOUT an existing ecosystem can actually be less hassle.

Date: 28 Sep 2005 03:21 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gridlore.livejournal.com
Always a fun option.

And of course, the massive world that lost its atmopshere to the effects of the close F2 V primary just happens to be home to massive deposits of industrial metals and rare earths. So it becomes a boom world in its own right.

Date: 28 Sep 2005 05:16 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] isomeme.livejournal.com
I know it breaks the feel, but I'm all but certain that any starfaring future civilization will regard large planets, even habitable ones, as quaint luxuries, suitable for luxury-goods production and parkland, but no much else. Once you can mine asteroids and comets, and have drives capable of crossing interstellar distances, it's just easier and safer to build habitats than to colonize planets. Habitable planets have inconveniently high gravity and dense atmospheres, making them expensive to ship to or from. And they are prone to annoyances like weather and vulcanism and other unpleasant surprises which the space-borne will not want to deal with.

Actually, this could be a cool way to organize the campaign, and one that would mess with preconceptions -- lovely garden worlds are expendable, but chunks of high-grade chondrite with established mining infrastructure (including a thriving colony) are not.

Date: 28 Sep 2005 17:34 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cmdr-zoom.livejournal.com
You're right. It breaks the feel.

I also direct you to how little our currently "advanced" technology and culture has changed our fundamental chimphuman behavior.

Date: 29 Sep 2005 22:57 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gridlore.livejournal.com
Habitable planets also have the advantage of being good places to raise food. I agree that sources of scarce minerals will also been swarmed by colonists, but my point was that you don't have to cover a ridiculous amount of space to get a good number of interesting worlds. Hell, stay within 20ly of Sol, and you've got 111 stars, more than enough for any Traveller game I ever ran.

Date: 28 Sep 2005 20:22 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 10binary-cats.livejournal.com
or...of your looking for game props try this:

http://www.bathsheba.com/crystal/starmap/

i want one just in case i get really lost. Really really lost.

Date: 28 Sep 2005 23:22 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gridlore.livejournal.com
I linked to that a while back, very cool thing to have.

The site I'm using for my figures is:

http://www.projectrho.com/smap12.html

Very useful for the hard-science minded author/GM.

Profile

gridlore: Doug looking off camera with a grin (Default)
Douglas Berry

October 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
2223 2425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 18th, 2025 09:23 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios