I don't get it.
May. 9th, 2002 09:04 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Yesterday Curtis Williams died. He was 24.
Mr. Williams was paralyzed from the neck down. He broke his neck while playing for the University of Washington against Stanford. Reading the article, it became evident that since the October, 2000 game in which he was hurt, most of Mr. Williams' medical bills had been paid by university alumni and he had received hundreds of thousands of dollars from various fund raisers.
Why? This guy broke his neck while trying to spear a Stanford running back. That is completely against the rules for exactly this reason! The Stanford player put his head down to try to save his ribs from the incoming foul, and Williams lost.
So why is this guy, who did something that he knew was against the rules and stupid rewarded? Why did the Huskies dedicate their 2001 Rose Bowl win to him? Why give his death a six column story that makes him out to be a hero? If he had just tackled the Stanford player, he'd probably be in the NFL right now.
Maybe I'm just cynical because of the pain I see friends going through over deaths that were never trumpeted in the papers. Because my own battle for life never was a lead on SportsCenter. Because all the kids who play by the rules can only admire their picture in the media guide and hope that they might get picked in the 5th round and make the practice squad.
But this guy commits a 15-yard personal foul, and he gets benefit dinners.
Mr. Williams was paralyzed from the neck down. He broke his neck while playing for the University of Washington against Stanford. Reading the article, it became evident that since the October, 2000 game in which he was hurt, most of Mr. Williams' medical bills had been paid by university alumni and he had received hundreds of thousands of dollars from various fund raisers.
Why? This guy broke his neck while trying to spear a Stanford running back. That is completely against the rules for exactly this reason! The Stanford player put his head down to try to save his ribs from the incoming foul, and Williams lost.
So why is this guy, who did something that he knew was against the rules and stupid rewarded? Why did the Huskies dedicate their 2001 Rose Bowl win to him? Why give his death a six column story that makes him out to be a hero? If he had just tackled the Stanford player, he'd probably be in the NFL right now.
Maybe I'm just cynical because of the pain I see friends going through over deaths that were never trumpeted in the papers. Because my own battle for life never was a lead on SportsCenter. Because all the kids who play by the rules can only admire their picture in the media guide and hope that they might get picked in the 5th round and make the practice squad.
But this guy commits a 15-yard personal foul, and he gets benefit dinners.
no subject
no subject
Date: 9 May 2002 09:28 (UTC)Probably for the same reason beating somebody to a pulp and calling it "boxing" is ok, but spanming a (consenting!) partner will get you charged with assualt.
We break things into little boxes and the social rules about them don't transfer.
"Sports is good."
Rant ahead
Date: 9 May 2002 09:46 (UTC)You are right, this is stupid. In fact the kinds of rewards that pro sports players get makes me sick, including their income. (Yes, I know baseball is the worst for income) I still cannot fathom why these guys get the money they do and teachers are fighting to not become homeless. Sure, sports games are fun and all, but come on. I know, I know, people will say they are inspirations and heroes for out kids. Sure, the Doug Flouties (sp) and Joe Montanas are out there, but it is the scandals of these people that make the news. Bah! And look at this, this kid is rewarded for breaking the rules, what kind of hero does that? Besides, inspiration or not, who the hell is going to be running this place in 30 or 40 years? The school system was failing when I was in it... and it's gotten worse! Dude, the world sucks. Pro sports folks should donate half their income to teachers and they should start behaving like the role models they claim to be.
**Note: Yes I know not all pro sports players are bad and in fact some do a lot for the community and education.
Re: Rant ahead
Date: 9 May 2002 11:44 (UTC)One can imagine a more rational way to value contributions, but all attempts to implement such have been horrible fiascos. It may be that as humans we're stuck with this situation as the best of an array of bad choices.
Re: Rant ahead
Date: 9 May 2002 12:30 (UTC)Re: Rant ahead
Date: 10 May 2002 07:57 (UTC)Re: Rant ahead
Bread and Circuses-give 'em violence to keep them
from seeing the flaws. Worked really good for
the Roman Empire........