![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Why? Because -- principally because of children. I mean, it's -- it is the reason for marriage. It's not to affirm the love of two people. I mean, that's not what marriage is about. I mean, if that were the case, then lots of different people and lots of different combinations could be, quote, "married."
Marriage is not about affirming somebody's love for somebody else. It's about uniting together to be open to children, to further civilization in our society.
Well, I'm shocked. Read the entire transcript here.
Feel free to leave Tricky Ricky a not at his website. Just click on the email link.
Marriage is not about affirming somebody's love for somebody else. It's about uniting together to be open to children, to further civilization in our society.
Well, I'm shocked. Read the entire transcript here.
Feel free to leave Tricky Ricky a not at his website. Just click on the email link.
no subject
Date: 4 Aug 2003 09:42 (UTC)However, if government does have a legitimate interest in this area, it is in seeing to it that children are properly cared for no matter what decisions their parents make. Of course, in this age of out-of-wedlock kids and easy divorce, that function really isn't served by marriage anymore, but you can see what the Senator is driving at, I think.
no subject
Date: 4 Aug 2003 10:08 (UTC)no subject
Date: 4 Aug 2003 16:49 (UTC)I can't wait for someone to pull the 'makin' babies' bit on me either.
Yeah, and...
Date: 4 Aug 2003 17:09 (UTC)