![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I am the Infantry.
I am my country's strength in war, her deterent in peace.
I am the heart of the fight, wherever, whenever.
I carry America's faith and honor against her enemies.
I am the Queen of Battle.
I am what my country expects me to be
the best trained soldier in the world.
In the race for victory,
I am swift,
determined,
and courageous,
armed with a fierce will to win.
Never will I fail my country's trust.
Always I fight on,
through the foe,
to the objective,
to triumph over all.
If necessary,
I fight to my death.
By my steadfast courage, I have won 200 years of freedom.
I yield not-
to weakness,
to hunger,
to cowardice,
to fatigue,
to superior odds,
for I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight.
I forsake not-
my country,
my mission,
my comrades,
my sacred duty.
I am relentless.
I am always there, now and forever.
I AM THE INFANTRY!
FOLLOW ME!
Don't see anything there about who I sleep with on the weekends. But hey, did anyone tell John McCain that we're the Queen of Battle?
About damn time, and now the wingnuts are going to explode. I shall sit back and enjoy the show.
no subject
Date: 19 Dec 2010 01:44 (UTC)no subject
Date: 19 Dec 2010 02:06 (UTC)no subject
Date: 19 Dec 2010 04:05 (UTC)no subject
Date: 19 Dec 2010 05:29 (UTC)no subject
Date: 19 Dec 2010 12:42 (UTC)no subject
Date: 19 Dec 2010 01:50 (UTC)"If not now, when?"
The (only* group that the survey showed to be mostly against where the folks *in combat*.
As I understand it, they won't have to deal with any of the changes until they get rotated *out* of combat. And the folks getting rotated in will be ones that've had time to adjust (or if there isn't that much time until they get rotated in, they'll not be scheduled for the training and stuff until *they* are rotated out.
The Special Forces types gave a rather more likely answer. "Yeah, there's a gay guy in our unit. He's huge and he's death on two feet. So what if he's gay. We want to keep him."
no subject
Date: 19 Dec 2010 05:31 (UTC)... D'oh! Took me a second to get that one.
no subject
Date: 19 Dec 2010 06:41 (UTC)Having myself served, I agree that it ultimately means nothing for the mission of the US Armed Forces. They whom will serve, shall serve, regardless of who serves with them.
I do admit, though, that I am stifling my curiosity to go over to military.com's forums and see what peoples' comments are there. Some of the incendiary comments there make the average internet troll look like a sleepy kitten; I can only imagine that the wannabes and others of their ilk are hopping mad.
no subject
Date: 19 Dec 2010 12:04 (UTC)The last remaining argument against gays in the military.
no subject
Date: 19 Dec 2010 12:32 (UTC)