Now THAT'S a proper Prince Royal!
Feb. 28th, 2008 05:59 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
UK's Prince Harry fighting in Afghanistan
Oh, HELL yeah. He could have played it safe, graduated from Sandhurst and accepted a safe assignment designed to protect the third in line to the Throne of England. But Lieutenant Harry Wales (His Royal Highness Prince Henry of Wales to you civies) is a soldier. Denied serving with the Blues and Royals in Iraq; Lt. Wales retrained as a Forward Air Controller and has been serving in combat directing RAF airstrikes against the Taliban.
In combat. Exposing himself to enemy fire to accurately direct incoming jets and helicopters to kill the enemies of western civilization. Somewhere, Henry V is smiling.
HRH Prince Henry of Wales will pick up many titles and honors in his life. But the one that will probably carry the most weight in his heart will be the simplest. Tommy.
Uh-RAH, Leftenant Wales!
The UK's Prince Harry has been serving on the frontline in Afghanistan and seen combat, the UK Ministry of Defense confirmed Thursday.
He was deployed 10 weeks ago and his fellow soldiers were sworn to secrecy.
The prince's status is currently being reviewed, the Ministry of Defense said.
Harry is third in line to the British throne and serves with the Blues and Royals.
His main role has been as a member of a group called Joint Tactical Air Control, or JTAC.
"As far as I'm concerned I'm out here as a normal JTAC on the ground and not as Prince Harry" he said.
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said: "The whole of Britain will be proud of the outstanding service he is giving. For the last 10 weeks, he has joined the thousands of members of the British Armed Forces who have served with such distinction in difficult circumstances in Afghanistan since 2001."
In a pre-deployment interview with the British Press Association, he said: "If I'm wanted, if I'm needed, then I will serve my country as I signed up to do."
The head of the British Army, Chief of the General Staff Sir Richard Dannatt, said Harry's deployment had been kept secret after striking an agreement with the media.
British and international media -- including CNN -- had agreed not to report Harry's deployment because of security concerns for him and his unit. The military confirmed the operation after a U.S. Web site broke the news blackout.
Dannatt said: "What the last two months have shown is that it is perfectly possible for Prince Harry to be employed just the same as other Army officers of his rank and experience.
"His conduct on operations in Afghanistan has been exemplary. He has been fully involved in operations and has run the same risks as everyone else in his Battlegroup. "In common with all of his generation in the army today, he is a credit to the nation."
Dannatt added that he and senior commanders will now be reviewing Harry's deployment.
Last year, the military ruled Harry could not be sent to Iraq because publicity about the deployment could put him and his unit at risk.
Oh, HELL yeah. He could have played it safe, graduated from Sandhurst and accepted a safe assignment designed to protect the third in line to the Throne of England. But Lieutenant Harry Wales (His Royal Highness Prince Henry of Wales to you civies) is a soldier. Denied serving with the Blues and Royals in Iraq; Lt. Wales retrained as a Forward Air Controller and has been serving in combat directing RAF airstrikes against the Taliban.
In combat. Exposing himself to enemy fire to accurately direct incoming jets and helicopters to kill the enemies of western civilization. Somewhere, Henry V is smiling.
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers;
For he to-day that sheds his blood with me
Shall be my brother; be he ne'er so vile,
This day shall gentle his condition;
And gentlemen in England now-a-bed
Shall think themselves accurs'd they were not here,
And hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks
That fought with us upon Saint Crispin's day."
HRH Prince Henry of Wales will pick up many titles and honors in his life. But the one that will probably carry the most weight in his heart will be the simplest. Tommy.
Uh-RAH, Leftenant Wales!
no subject
Date: 29 Feb 2008 02:10 (UTC)And let's also hear it for Matt "The Coward" Drudge, who decided to run the story at the risk of Harry's safety (and that of his mates) when even the British tabloids had agreed to keep mum. When The Sun, of all papers, is holding itself to a higher standard of conduct, it's time to seriously reconsider your ethical position.
no subject
Date: 29 Feb 2008 15:27 (UTC)Still, I want to throttle Drudge.
no subject
Date: 29 Feb 2008 15:52 (UTC)In any case, the embargo on this story was voluntary, in exchange for the promise videos/photos and access when Harry returned (he was slated for a four-month tour). Some major US news outlets, such as CNN, were included, sio it wasn't just a UK thing. Drudge presumably burned it because he wasn't going to get any of that access.
no subject
Date: 29 Feb 2008 16:03 (UTC)no subject
Date: 29 Feb 2008 03:05 (UTC)no subject
Date: 29 Feb 2008 05:03 (UTC)no subject
Date: 29 Feb 2008 16:35 (UTC)no subject
Date: 29 Feb 2008 03:50 (UTC)no subject
Date: 29 Feb 2008 04:36 (UTC)no subject
Date: 29 Feb 2008 04:03 (UTC)no subject
Date: 29 Feb 2008 04:18 (UTC)Charles so needs to abdicate in favor of William, and Harry needs to follow in his Uncle Andy's footsteps (the last Royal to serve in combat) by dating porn stars.
Rule Britannia!
no subject
Date: 29 Feb 2008 05:04 (UTC)no subject
Date: 29 Feb 2008 04:18 (UTC)And darn -you- too, sir. Your quote brought tears to my eyes. ^_^
no subject
Date: 29 Feb 2008 04:34 (UTC)no subject
Date: 29 Feb 2008 05:05 (UTC)no subject
Date: 29 Feb 2008 14:50 (UTC)2) I'm pissed at whoever leaked this story, because now Prince Harry will have to be evacuated, because he's simply too tempting a target. Bastard journalist.
no subject
Date: 29 Feb 2008 15:29 (UTC)no subject
Date: 29 Feb 2008 22:05 (UTC)no subject
Date: 1 Mar 2008 12:31 (UTC)