Bleach. I need bleach!
Jun. 4th, 2007 04:25 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
For reasons related mostly to laziness, I ended up watching Maury today.
Great Ghu, I really hope this is all fake. Seriously, these people are too pathetic to live. The usual sweepings from low-rent trailer parks who seem to lack brains, common sense, self-respect, and self-control. Lots of screaming, cheating, and security rushing the stage.
Seriously, the Springer show was more dignified most days.
But the reason I post about this is the stunning revelation that Maury Povich has access to amazing technologies that could win the ware on Terror! Each segment featured a lie-detector result. Now, I've been on a polygraph a few times. You are asked yes or no questions. "Is your name Douglas Berry?" Yes. "Are you a doctor?" No. "Did you kill Lee Harvey Oswald?" No.
But Maury's machine went beyond that! It not only reveled lies (with apparent 100% accuracy) but also reveled details! Asking "did you cheat on your girlfriend?" gives not only the veracity of the response, but the number of transgressions.
I want that machine.
Great Ghu, I really hope this is all fake. Seriously, these people are too pathetic to live. The usual sweepings from low-rent trailer parks who seem to lack brains, common sense, self-respect, and self-control. Lots of screaming, cheating, and security rushing the stage.
Seriously, the Springer show was more dignified most days.
But the reason I post about this is the stunning revelation that Maury Povich has access to amazing technologies that could win the ware on Terror! Each segment featured a lie-detector result. Now, I've been on a polygraph a few times. You are asked yes or no questions. "Is your name Douglas Berry?" Yes. "Are you a doctor?" No. "Did you kill Lee Harvey Oswald?" No.
But Maury's machine went beyond that! It not only reveled lies (with apparent 100% accuracy) but also reveled details! Asking "did you cheat on your girlfriend?" gives not only the veracity of the response, but the number of transgressions.
I want that machine.
no subject
Date: 4 Jun 2007 23:37 (UTC)no subject
Date: 4 Jun 2007 23:41 (UTC)no subject
Date: 5 Jun 2007 01:57 (UTC)no subject
Date: 7 Jun 2007 18:07 (UTC)Or those security tapes that reveal it couldn't have been the suspect, since the shadow on the concrete floor reflected through a car-mirror 50' away doesn't have a mole, and the suspect's twin is without one as well!