OK, I have to go to New York
Jun. 6th, 2006 09:21 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
and kill Ann Coulter. Really. Because if I do it before
fimbrethil and a horde of others get a hold of her, it will be an act of mercy.
Seriously, after everything this moron has said about the city and people of New York, how is it she is still able to live there? I can't imagine her jumping on the 6 Train at 103rd without being beaten senseless by outraged New Yorkers, and would immigrant-phobic Ann even dare to ride in a taxi? I think NYC should engage in a mass shunning. She doesn't get served in stores or at restaurants. Doors get slammed in her face. No deliveries to her home or office. Nothing illegal, just New Yorkers telling this upstart import that she's not welcome, and can go back to whatever foul pit spawned her anytime now.
That is, unless I kill her first.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Seriously, after everything this moron has said about the city and people of New York, how is it she is still able to live there? I can't imagine her jumping on the 6 Train at 103rd without being beaten senseless by outraged New Yorkers, and would immigrant-phobic Ann even dare to ride in a taxi? I think NYC should engage in a mass shunning. She doesn't get served in stores or at restaurants. Doors get slammed in her face. No deliveries to her home or office. Nothing illegal, just New Yorkers telling this upstart import that she's not welcome, and can go back to whatever foul pit spawned her anytime now.
That is, unless I kill her first.
no subject
Date: 7 Jun 2006 05:11 (UTC)I called her a fucking cunt at least five times during that interview.
What really annoyed me, was that pretentious ass accent of hers. Gah.
no subject
Date: 7 Jun 2006 05:31 (UTC)...I'm not sure why the anger.
She seems to be saying that politics should be argued on merits and not hyper-emotionality by people that you don't risk vilification if you argue against...
...which is an oddly self fulfilling prophecy because you're offering just such vilification for her questioning, albeit in an inflammatory manner, the motivations and qualifications of these women as political speakers.
I'm not a fan of Ann Coulter and haven't heard anything from her (beyond that clip) in over two and a half years, but I think dissent against an inherently emotional method of persuasion in a process that demands rationalism isn't a bad thing.
Her motivations may or may not be kosher, but I'm not sure animosity is warranted.
Uh oh, a Boondocks reference
Date: 7 Jun 2006 05:42 (UTC)no subject
Date: 7 Jun 2006 05:47 (UTC)no subject
Date: 7 Jun 2006 06:09 (UTC)Without the pressures/controls/unified set of ideals conferred by a shared, central religion and paired authority, there is no practical way to make a majority share a belief system.
(Not that I think that's a good idea.)
People need to learn to deal with the difficulty and create some form of method to interact and lose the antagonism.
no subject
Date: 7 Jun 2006 06:57 (UTC)no subject
Date: 7 Jun 2006 11:04 (UTC)no subject
Date: 7 Jun 2006 11:13 (UTC)What I dislike here is that she lumps all the widows into one group. Yes, some widows use their status as a 9/11 for political reasons but not all. And why focus on just the widows? Why not attack the children and widowers too? Surely, there are widowers and offspring that have used their status politically? I am very quiet about being a 9/11 widow for the most part. I don't parade around saying it to people and I don't use it for leverage. But I don't think everyone deals with grief and loss the same way either. I don't think she truly udnerstands what any of us are going through. IMO, I bet some of the widows have channelled their energies into political ventures because if they sit still, the pain will make them crazy.
The best thing to do with people who have such a narrowminded view as that is to not feed their egos. She is right to say it's a national tragedy but she forgets that it is a very personal one too. And actually, the nation itself chose to give us a spotlight when they created a fund to help us and then decided that a memorial on a grand scale was necessary. People needed to put a face to the tragedy and so many of us found ourselves thrust into the spotlight. Who is she to say how we use that?
no subject
Date: 7 Jun 2006 12:10 (UTC)I will quite happily...
Date: 7 Jun 2006 12:15 (UTC)Beware...
Date: 7 Jun 2006 14:07 (UTC)-Tom
('Sides she doesn't know that Thomas Jefferson was our third President)
no subject
Date: 7 Jun 2006 15:48 (UTC)Re: Uh oh, a Boondocks reference
Date: 7 Jun 2006 15:50 (UTC)no subject
Date: 7 Jun 2006 16:50 (UTC)She's smart enough to use the media as her soapbox. She's rich enough to get the media's attention. She's blonde enough to look good on the tube. And she's republican enough to believe that the Shrub is a good thing.
Well, except for that last bit, and abusing the privilege, she doesn't deserve to be killed. I would rather stick her in a room with the survivors & families of 9/11 and let her answer their questions. That could be good television.
Not that I would watch that performance either.