Hmm.. A Sorcerer perhaps?
Apr. 16th, 2003 08:22 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
gridloreMy D&D stats.
Str: 9
Dex: 13
Con: 8
Int: 13
Wis: 13
Chr: 15
The Strength and Constitution are obvioulsy from my health problems. Under 3rd Edition rules, I'd probably be best off as a Sorcerer. They have Charisma as their primary stat. When I get a stat upgrade at 4th level, I'd take it in Constitution.
I moved the results around to match the way they are stacked on a D&D3rd character sheet.
This wouldn't be a bad character to run actually. I enjoy characters with a weakness, whether it be a low stat or a Disadvantage for me to wrap my play around.
Str: 9
Dex: 13
Con: 8
Int: 13
Wis: 13
Chr: 15
The Strength and Constitution are obvioulsy from my health problems. Under 3rd Edition rules, I'd probably be best off as a Sorcerer. They have Charisma as their primary stat. When I get a stat upgrade at 4th level, I'd take it in Constitution.
I moved the results around to match the way they are stacked on a D&D3rd character sheet.
This wouldn't be a bad character to run actually. I enjoy characters with a weakness, whether it be a low stat or a Disadvantage for me to wrap my play around.
