gridlore: Doug looking off camera with a grin (Lego)
Douglas Berry ([personal profile] gridlore) wrote2003-11-10 09:51 am

AQOTM

Wow. Over in alt.atheism, we have two Quote of the Month contests. One for the atheists, and one for the theists who plague the group. The TQOTM is usually spectacular examples of stupidity. The AQOTM is usually in response to the theists. Read the winners here

This month, I have been nominated (and seconded) by two different sets of people!



> "For those that do not feel they NEED a savior .. let me ask you ..
> Have you ever lied? Or stolen? Or cheated? If you answer "yes" to any
> of these, then you have sinned. Now honestly, can you see sin and God
> in the same room?"

This would be the same God that killed every living thing on Earth
(except for a tiny boat) in the flood? The same God who let Satan
torment Lot on a bet? The same God who admits to be the source of
evil? That God? Debbie, he's not just in the same room with evil..
he owns the bloody factory.

Or would, if any of it was true.


So now, at the end of the month, we all vote. The winner gets a shiny plaque from the Evil Atheist Conspiracy (which does not, of course, exist.)

[identity profile] isomeme.livejournal.com 2003-11-10 11:12 am (UTC)(link)
Not to mention the fact that two of everything doesn't constitute a successful breeding population for most chordata. Even with very careful selection of maximally-varying genetics, I've seen estimates that you need at least twenty individuals to avoid severe inbreeding problems.

Of course, you can say that God miraculously overcame the inbreeding issues, but at that point, you have to wonder why a deity who could do sophisticated gene-splicing in bulk using only the power of his mind needed a boat and Noah and all that. Why not just wish them all into a nature preserve on Tau Ceti II until the flood's done? Or just create beings who behave themselves better, rather than punishing people for acting like they're built to act?

Ah, well.

On the question of God having created evil, this was fought out in the early Church councils. The opposite view leads to dualism, as you have to posit a God of Evil powerful enough to resist getting swatted by the God of Good. This was theologically unacceptable, and hence declared heretical (the "Manichean heresy"). Alas, a necessary consequence of accepting no competition for the one God is that the one God is responsible for everything that happens. This is where we fade off into the "mysterious ways" non-explanation.

[identity profile] nolly.livejournal.com 2003-11-10 03:10 pm (UTC)(link)
7 pairs of the clean ones, and you can probably skip everything aquatic, though fresh vs salt water becomes interesting. Some of the birds could probably nest on the roof, too.

As for evil, and omniscience, and omnipotence, and free will, and all that fun tangly stuff, I'm just going to point y'all at this bit (http://www.livejournal.com/~meowse/14576.html) by the lovely [livejournal.com profile] meowse, who's much better with words than I am, as he captures my perspective pretty accuately.