Immanuel Kant was a bloody pissant...
Take the philosopher test
1. Kant (100%)
2. Epicureans (91%)
3. Mill (84%)
4. Prescriptivism (69%)
5. Rand (62%)
6. Sartre (62%)
7. Aquinas (61%)
8. Spinoza (58%)
9. Aristotle (55%)
10. Bentham (55%)
11. Stoics (54%)
12. Nietzsche (47%)
13. Noddings (42%)
14. Ockham (41%)
15. Hume (36%)
16. Hobbes (32%)
17. Augustine (25%)
18. Plato (24%)
19. Cynics (15%)
My top result:
Immanuel Kant (1724-1804)
1. Kant (100%)
2. Epicureans (91%)
3. Mill (84%)
4. Prescriptivism (69%)
5. Rand (62%)
6. Sartre (62%)
7. Aquinas (61%)
8. Spinoza (58%)
9. Aristotle (55%)
10. Bentham (55%)
11. Stoics (54%)
12. Nietzsche (47%)
13. Noddings (42%)
14. Ockham (41%)
15. Hume (36%)
16. Hobbes (32%)
17. Augustine (25%)
18. Plato (24%)
19. Cynics (15%)
My top result:
Immanuel Kant (1724-1804)
- We can make a prior judgments; the negation of such judgments would a logical absurdity because a priori knowledge is known without sensory data. 
 - We combine a priori and a posteriori knowledge to 
 - We have freedom 
 - God is not essential for his moral argumentation 
 - The objective facts about the human knowledge leads to Kant's morality 
 - We must act ought of a sense of duty in order to be moral 
 - Moral action does not come out of following inclinations 
 - Moral standards must be followed without qualification 
 - We must always act so that the means of our actions could be a universal law 
 - We must always treat people as ends not means 
Very interesting.