gridlore: Doug looking off camera with a grin (Default)
Douglas Berry ([personal profile] gridlore) wrote2005-10-01 05:05 am
Entry tags:

Serenity.

Simply fucking ROCKED. Well written, beautifully envisioned, and executed perfectly. But I have one little rant that isn't really a spoiler.

The series and film claims this all takes place in a single solar system with "dozens of planets and moons that were terraformed." (Or more accurately, Southern California-formed.)

This is freaking impossible with a single star. It's have to be a freaking bright supergiant to have a life zone large enough. So I, being an absolute geek, have come up with a solution.

Serenity Actually takes place in a trinary system. The central star is a fairly bright giant (call it a F5 III) with three gas giants in its life zone. These GG have multiple large moons. The second star is a G0 V orbiting at 80+ AU, with two worlds in its life zone, plus one right outside the edge (but still close enough to be somewhere above utterly frozen. The last star is a G8 V with a few piddling worlds and moons that were terraformed, but not overly well. This is the "outer system" mentioned in the canon, since a distant trianry could be well over 300 AU away.

Other than that, not a single complaint about the film.

[identity profile] cmdr-zoom.livejournal.com 2005-10-01 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)
(tiny little spoiler)
Also, the notion of one of those habitable (Earth-prime, in fact) planets being WAYYYY out from everything else...
Oy.
Astronomy and planetology are obviously not Whedon's strong suit.

[identity profile] cmdr-zoom.livejournal.com 2005-10-01 10:26 pm (UTC)(link)
(rant continues/concludes)

And the reason it bothers me so is that everything else is so good. Whedon has created these great characters, great story, cultures, technology...
And then set it in a star system with all the plausibility of a bunch of flat plates being carried around on the backs of elephants standing on turtles. And he either doesn't realize this, or doesn't care.