gridlore: Doug looking off camera with a grin (M-16)
Douglas Berry ([personal profile] gridlore) wrote2003-11-10 08:55 am

Oh, Good Grief!

Read this story:

Mom caught in custody fight also battling Army over return to Iraq Soldier declared AWOL as she seeks new child-care arrangement

OK. I have one question. If you have SEVEN children, what the fuck are you doing in the United States Army?!

What, did neither you nor your husband, a platoon sergeant in a combat unit, understand that being in the service meant that you might just be called on to head overseas for extended periods to, I don't know, FIGHT A GODDAMN WAR!? Did you think those camouflage uniforms and weapons were for show and tell? During WWII, soldiers (even the female WACs) were away from their families for years.

Then there is the sheer number of children involved. The woman involved is 30, Two of the kids are from her husband's previous relationship. That means this woman has had five children.. and she's thirty. I have to wonder how often she even made drills! Now dear old Mom is facing prison time (intentionally missing a movement to avoid duty in a combat zone is a death penalty offense in the military.) Realistically, she won't get lined up against a wall and shot. But she's screwed herself but good.

She's also screwed everyone in her unit who will now have to shoulder her load while she gets court-martialed. A 14-hour day will become a 16-hour day. A soldier won't be seen quite as quickly. Call me an old-fashioned reactionary if you like, but if there is anything that would prevent you from deploying and doing your duty for as long as it takes, you should be separated from the service. Ridiculous.

And now we'll see the usual suspects decry the "inhumanity of the military." Guess what? Nobody held a gun to this alleged adult's head and forced her to recite the Oath of Enlistment. Please read that. I don't see anything in there that says "unless it inconveniences me and my family."

[identity profile] dafydd.livejournal.com 2003-11-10 11:29 am (UTC)(link)
And, which order would you prefer that she break?

1) The one from her Commanding Officer?

2) The one from the CO State Judge requiring that one parent stay home with the children?

[identity profile] gridlore.livejournal.com 2003-11-10 05:44 pm (UTC)(link)
The State judge. Mainly because She is a member of the United States Army, and cannot be ordered to do anything by a state judiciary bench.

Is she a hardship case? Probably. Should she have left the CONG when she had 5+2 kids? Absolutely. Are her actions going to end badly all around? Damn straight.

Her husband is equally at fault here. One of them should have seen this possibility coming, and left the Guard.

[identity profile] aurictech.livejournal.com 2003-11-11 12:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Pile some blame on the mother-in-law, too. If the event timeline in the article is correct, the mother-in-law waited until after the custody court case to spring her unwillingness to continue being the children's caretaker on the soldier-mom.

What I'm wondering is, why was the custody court case even going forward while the parents were deployed? Federal law prevents legal actions against service members while they are deployed.