Holy fuck.

[gridlore]

Dana Perino, former Press secretary to President Bush, states that we did not suffer any terrorist attacks during Bush's term.

Watch that. The amazing thing is that no one corrects her.

I'd love to make her get back on Fox and apologize to every victim of the 9/11 attacks, the anthrax mailings, and the DC snipers, by name. No commercials, no breaks, no glass of water, she's just forced to apologize to the over 3,000 victims of terrorism on American soil during Bush's reign. Then we shoot her. For being a freaking tool.

Comments

Technically,

[capplor.livejournal.com]

the DC sniper attacks were not terrorism, and, until the source is found, neither were the anthrax mailings. Nor were the Ft. Hood shootings. (And thus, demonstrably, President Obama kept us safe from terrorism longer than President Bush.)

[weirdodragoncat.livejournal.com]

Good gods...what a stupid twat

[caraig.livejournal.com]

It's Fox News. Retraction? Nevar!

The upsetting thing is that they're legally allowed to lie, and no matter how many times they present demonstrably false information or purposely inciting fear (see icon!) or outrage or other threats to good order and discipline... they're allowed to do it.

And no matter how many times they get called on it, they keep on truckin'.

(There's no invective I could label Rupert Murdoch and his crew of tools that wouldn't be taken by at least some of them as a badge of some sort of perverted honor.)

[fayanora.livejournal.com]

WOT???

[seawasp]

She's telling the god's honest truth. For her, there was no suffering, so we did not suffer such an attack. Why, we WELCOMED one. It allowed us to go do so many things we WANTED to do but didn't have a good excuse for at the time.